* Understanding hadith: .as Faqih inferred accepted hadith, but understand it wrong, and employ it in wrong way, thereby creating a wrong understanding (fikh).

*jurisprudential devise; including errors in understanding the strange words, and errors of fundamentalism, and errors caused by the novel sense , conclusions ,and hand copying.

*ignoring the hadith: when the jurists faces an acceptable hadeeth in question [1] but mistakes in judgment because of not employing the hadith; either because he had not been informed or had heard and left employing underestimated hadith; may be either for no religious reason or because nodal conviction.

When we talk about faulting others in interpretation of ahadeeth we refer the causes of difference in the jurisprudence on two levels:

*erroneous in judgment

*erroneous in understanding.

And To avoid these errors i suggested:

*Configuration in hadith whichsuit sjurisprudence.

* Filtering jurisprudential references from errors

*Customize Institutions to face the errors in Hadith and Prevention of forward similar misjudges